WITH MOM AT THE WATER PARKLast year we already shared some of her videos.
A mother at a water park with her son, enjoying the day, playing in the water — an
apparently innocent scene. The difference was her:
very attractive, wearing a minimal bikini, aware of the camera and
the reaction it triggers. The contrast did the rest.
The videos
went viral. Millions of views,
massive attention and, as a logical consequence,
more followers on her blue account. The
family context was the wrapper; the
real spotlight was on her. And it worked.
This year, after checking her profile again, the story repeats itself.
Same setting,
same formula,
same type of content. The kid has grown… and
so have her followers. When something works, the natural thing to do is to
stick with it. The internet rewards repetition when the mix is right.
There’s nothing
explicit in the videos. Nothing really “happens.” And yet,
there’s something else. Something that’s not in what takes place, but in
how it’s framed and
why it’s consumed. The water park is almost an
excuse. The video lives in that
blurry line between the everyday and the calculated.
From there,
everyone draws their own conclusions. About
exposure, about
context, about whether everything is acceptable when the content is “
apparently” innocent. This isn’t an accusation or a verdict. It’s simply
putting the pieces on the table and looking at the whole picture.
I don’t judge.
I just share.
# Watch video
The slow-motion moment of the day.
RANDOM AI-GENERATED IMAGES VOL28Lately we keep hearing the same line:
artificial intelligence is going to take our jobs.
And it’s probably true. Not everyone’s, not all at once, but many of them. Factories, offices, services, creative work, customer support… the sector doesn’t matter.
If something can be automated and made cheaper, it will be.
And that’s where an uncomfortable question pops up:
if people lose their jobs, who’s going to buy what companies produce?
Because the system has always worked the same way: you work, you get paid, you consume. Companies sell because there’s money on the other side. But if that “other side” loses its income,
the equation starts to squeak. Badly.
The usual answer is optimistic: new jobs will appear, wealth will be redistributed, solutions will be found. Progress always ends up benefiting everyone.
But…
does anyone really believe that those who concentrate power and money are losing sleep over it?
The famous
1% doesn’t need the
99% to live well. What it needs is to
maintain its status. And that doesn’t depend on whether you or I have a job, but on
staying on top. Money matters, sure, but
power matters more. And power is not handed out out of goodwill.
Sometimes we think they’ll “have to find a solution”, otherwise the system will collapse. But maybe not. Maybe the system doesn’t collapse:
it just becomes smaller and more closed. Fewer people inside, more people left outside.
It’s not a new idea. It’s been in countless movies:
walled cities, elites living comfortably with every service available, and outside… whatever’s left. Survival, precariousness, chaos.
It’s always felt like science fiction. But so did
many things we now consider completely normal.
So maybe the real question isn’t whether AI is going to take our jobs.
The real question is:
do the people in charge actually care if it does?
And the honest answer
isn’t very optimistic.
Think about it.
And to make it easier to digest, I’m sharing
AI-generated images with you. It’s not all bad.
# View images
The human centipede returns.
The scene belongs to the porn parody
The Human Sexipede.
The acting weight falls on actresses Jynx Maze and Sunny Lane. In the following links you can watch several scenes they’ve starred in throughout their film careers.
Jynx Maze porn videos
Sunny Lane porn videos