AMATEUR FLESH: BLONDEBARBIE18Scrolling through
Reddit, I stumbled on a profile that feels like a
snapshot of our times. A
young woman taking full control of her looks, her youth, and her sexuality, and turning it all into a business. She posts on
Twitter, shows curated pieces on
Instagram, and funnels everything toward
OnlyFans—where the real money is: personalized content, exclusive photos, private chats… the full package. It’s no longer just about selfies; it’s a
whole economy built on direct access and intimacy.
And here’s where the
debate begins. Some see it as
smart, almost entrepreneurial—a modern way of cashing in on what society already values:
beauty, desire, attention. Others dismiss it as reckless, convinced these girls don’t really know what they’re getting into. Some call it an
honest living, not so different from modeling or acting. And then there are the critics who say it’s just
digital prostitution dressed up as empowerment. Opinions are scattered everywhere, shaped by morals, culture, and personal hang-ups about
sex and money.
The interesting part is how much the perspective has shifted over time.
Decades ago, female sexuality was something hidden, punished, or consumed behind closed doors. Today, it’s
monetized in the open, with young women running their own platforms, building their own audiences, and setting their own prices. What used to be controlled by studios, magazines, or webcam companies is now fully in their hands.
No bosses, no middlemen, just a direct line between creator and consumer.
It’s a product of
technology, sure—the rise of
social media,
digital payments, and platforms like
OnlyFans. But it also reflects a
shift in social values. We live in a time where
authenticity sells, where people crave unfiltered access, and where
intimacy can be packaged as a subscription. For some, it’s
liberating. For others,
disturbing. And maybe that’s the point: sexuality has always been controversial, but now it’s tangled up with algorithms, the
hustle economy, and the idea that your phone can be both your
office and your
stage.
Love it or hate it, this
new model isn’t going anywhere. What we’re seeing isn’t just
young women making money—it’s an
ongoing negotiation between
technology, sex, and society about what’s acceptable, what’s empowering, and what it really costs to put yourself out there.
# See photos and videos
You need to watch this one with the sound on.
RANDOM AI-GENERATED IMAGES VOL21While AI accelerates, we’re still trying to understand it—and predict it.
Lately it feels like artificial intelligence isn’t just moving fast:
it’s gone feral. In his latest interview, Geoffrey Hinton—the “godfather” of all this—drops a few unsettling truths: countries compete with countries, companies compete with companies, and when everyone floors the accelerator at once,
there’s no such thing as a collective brake. Nobody wants to be the one to lift their foot while the rest pull ahead.
Hinton sketches a future where AI could replace much of intellectual work,
widen the wealth gap, and strain democracy. He talks about
superintelligence in 10–20 years, and about what’s already here: the
overwhelming advantages of digital systems over humans (they copy for free, learn at another scale, don’t sleep). Then comes the awkward question: if automation doesn’t create enough new jobs this time, who’s paying the rent for those left out?
History says every technological revolution kills some jobs and creates others. The printing press, the steam engine, electricity, the internet… There was always work in the end—different work, but work. And yes, it’s also true that
nobody in 1995 pictured influencers, community managers, or people making a living fine-tuning algorithms. Maybe that happens again. Or maybe not. If the curve steepens the way Hinton suggests, the adjustment could be
faster and more
brutal than we’re used to. Hence the talk of basic income, new social contracts, real lifelong learning (not a sticker), and regulation that doesn’t kill innovation—or hand the future to three players with server farms in the desert.
If you want to hear him unfiltered, the interview is here:
watch the episode.
And now, back to our thing…
While the gurus decide whether they’ll save us or sack us, we stick to what we do:
random images created by AI. Beautiful women, flawless skin that doesn’t exist, gazes nobody set, curves a network imagined after devouring millions of pixels.
It’s synthetic, sure… and it still stirs something very human.
The paradox is delicious: maybe AI will take our jobs, worsen collective decisions, or multiply inequality—but today,
today, look at what it already does.
It fantasizes, provokes, and hooks. And here we are, finger on the mouse, thinking that maybe it’s worth living (and dying) with this spectacle in the background. Relax: the apocalypse isn’t here yet; in the meantime,
enjoy the simulation.
# See images
Elizabeth Hurley and the dress that left everyone stunned at the premiere of “Four Weddings and a Funeral” in 1994.
instagram.com/elizabethhurley1